Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Musk Says This Automaker, Not Saudis, Saved Tesla From Brink Of Bankruptcy In 2009 With 'Crucial' $50M Investment

Published 22/02/2024, 11:37
Updated 22/02/2024, 12:40
© Reuters.  Musk Says This Automaker, Not Saudis, Saved Tesla From Brink Of Bankruptcy In 2009 With 'Crucial' $50M Investment

Benzinga - by Anan Ashraf, Benzinga Editor.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk credited German carmaker Daimler AG with saving the EV giant in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis when it was on the brink of bankruptcy.

What Happened: Musk revealed on X, formerly Twitter, that Mercedes-Benz parent Daimler invested $50 million into Tesla in May 2009, providing crucial funding during the financial crisis.

“Daimler's $50M investment in May 2009 was the crucial money that saved Tesla,” Musk stated. “We would have bounced payroll one month later.”

This clarification follows Musk’s recent criticism of rival EV maker Lucid Group, alleging its reliance on Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) to survive. The PIF has injected about $5.4 billion into Lucid since 2018, making it the majority owner.

In response to a user’s query on X, Musk clarified that while Daimler played a crucial role in Tesla’s survival, the Saudis did not contribute to saving the company.

Old Bones? Musk has previously criticized Lucid’s financial performance, warning of potential bankruptcy in June 2022 due to substantial spending, alongside Rivian.

Addressing Peter Rawlinson‘s background, Musk disputed a user’s claim of the Lucid chief previously being Tesla Model S’s chief engineer. Musk asserted that he held the position and alleged that Rawlinson joined Tesla after the Model S prototype was developed and left before production started.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Musk also criticized Rawlinson’s compensation, describing it as disproportionate to Lucid’s shareholder value. Despite a 0.5% increase in Lucid’s shares on Wednesday, the stock has plummeted nearly 63% over the past year.

Why It Matters: Earlier this month, Musk voiced his opposition to Rawlinson’s $6 million cash bonus approved by the Lucid board. This criticism comes amidst Musk’s own legal battle over a Delaware court’s rejection of his $56 billion pay package.

According to the Equilar CEO Compensation Survey, Rawlinson’s total compensation in 2022 reached $379 million, significantly surpassing that of General Motors Co CEO Mary Barra, whose total compensation was approximately $34 million.

Check out more of Benzinga’s Future Of Mobility coverage by following this link.

Read More: What Dented Rivian’s Q4 Margins? CFO Reveals Huge Dip In Deliveries For Prime Customer

Image: MidJourney and Jonathan Weiss-on-Shutterstock

© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.