Competitor Analysis: Evaluating Cadence Design Sys And Competitors In Software Industry

Benzinga - by Benzinga Insights, Benzinga Staff Writer.

In today's rapidly changing and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully evaluate companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Cadence Design Sys (NASDAQ:CDNS) against its key competitors in the Software industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.

Cadence Design Sys Background Cadence Design Systems is a provider of electronic design automation software, intellectual property, and system design and analysis products. EDA software automates the chip design process, enhancing design accuracy, productivity, and complexity in a full-flow end-to-end solution. Cadence offers a portfolio of design IP, as well as system design and analysis products, which enable system-level analysis and verification solutions. Cadence's comprehensive portfolio is benefiting from a mutual convergence of semiconductor companies moving up-stack toward systems-like companies, and systems companies moving down-stack toward in-house semiconductor design. The resulting expansion in EDA customers, alongside secular digitalization of various end markets, benefits EDA vendors like Cadence.

th, td { padding: 8px; text-align: left; }

th { background-color: #293a5a; color: #fff; text-align: left; }

tr:nth-child(even) { background-color: #f2f4f8; }

tr:hover { background-color: #e1e4ea; }

td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) { text-align: left; }

.dividend-amount { font-weight: bold; color: #0d6efd; }

.dividend-frequency { font-size: 12px; color: #6c757d; } When analyzing Cadence Design Sys, the following trends become evident:

• At 72.1, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.56x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.

• The elevated Price to Book ratio of 21.97 relative to the industry average by 1.54x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.

• The Price to Sales ratio of 16.91, which is 1.78x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.

• The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 7.56%, which is 1.23% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.

• Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $340 Million, which is 0.58x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.

• The gross profit of $880 Million is 0.53x below that of its industry, suggesting potential lower revenue after accounting for production costs.

• The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 13.88%, outperforming the industry average of 11.27%.

The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio indicates the proportion of debt and equity used by a company to finance its assets and operations.

Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.

In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Cadence Design Sys can be assessed by comparing it to its top 4 peers, resulting in the following observations:

• Cadence Design Sys exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers in the sector, as indicated by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.22.

• This suggests that the company has a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be seen as a positive aspect for investors.

This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

© 2023 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Read the original article on Benzinga