Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolios

Barclays must face US shareholder lawsuit over $17.7 billion debt sale blunder

Published 23/02/2024, 15:48
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Workers are seen in at Barclays bank offices in the Canary Wharf financial district in London, Britain, November 17, 2017. Picture taken November 17, 2017. REUTERS/Toby Melville/File Photo
BARC
-

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) -A U.S. judge ruled on Friday that Barclays (LON:BARC) must face a proposed class action by shareholders who accused the British bank of securities fraud related to its sale of $17.7 billion more debt than regulators allowed.

U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla in Manhattan said shareholders adequately alleged that Barclays' failure to disclose the absence of internal controls that might have caught five years of errant debt sales was a material omission of fact.

She also let shareholders try to prove that Barclays and several officials including former CEO Jes Staley were "actionably reckless" in assuring that the bank complied with federal securities laws even as it "blindly" sold the debt.

Bank executives subsequently characterized the overissuance as an "entirely avoidable" and "self-inflicted" problem that would not have required "rocket science" to avert.

Barclays declined to comment. Staley's lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lawyers for shareholders led by the Boston Retirement System pension fund did not immediately respond to similar requests.

The lawsuit followed Barclays' revelation in March 2022 that it had sold $15.2 billion more structured and exchange-traded notes in the prior five years than the $20.8 billion that U.S. regulators had authorized.

Four months later, the bank increased the oversold amount to $17.7 billion. It offered to repurchase the excess, and set aside 1.59 billion pounds ($2 billion) for the overissuance.

In a 57-page decision, Failla said shareholders could sue Barclays for statements including that the bank was "committed to operating within a strong system of internal control" and had policies and procedures that met regulatory standards.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The judge said such statements are often too generic to support a lawsuit, but Barclays' case had a "critical difference" because its system for tracking the debt sales "did not just underperform - it did not exist."

Failla also ruled that shareholders could not pursue a securities fraud claim over statements that Barclays made after the overissuances were discovered.

The lawsuit covered shareholder who lost money in Barclays' American depositary receipts from Feb. 18, 2021 to Feb. 14, 2023 as costs mounted over the blunder.

Staley stepped down as CEO in November 2021.

The case is In re Barclays Plc Securities Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-08172.

Latest comments

Wasn’t current CEO, Venkat, in charge of the US arm that sold all these securities. He seems to have been allowed to fly under the radar on this.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.