Get 40% Off
🚀 AI-picked stocks soar in May. PRFT is +55%—in just 16 days! Don’t miss June’s top picks.Unlock full list

British rail franchising model is 'broken' - parliamentary committee

Published 27/04/2018, 09:28
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: On the day that rail fares increase, passengers arrive at Waterloo Station in London
GOG
-
SGC
-

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain's model of contracting companies to run rail services is broken and the government should review it before awarding any more franchises, a parliamentary committee said on Friday in findings rejected by the Department for Transport.

It highlighted recent problems with two franchises - one in London and southeast England, the other linking London and Edinburgh - to illustrate what it called the government's "completely inadequate" management of rail contracts.

"The franchising model is broken and passengers are paying the price," said Meg Hillier, chair of the cross-party Public Accounts Committee (PAC).

"If taxpayers are to have any faith in government's ability to deliver an effective passenger rail network then it must conduct and act on a thorough review before any further franchises are awarded," she added in a statement.

The criticisms were rejected by the Department for Transport (DfT) which said the report had failed to understand the complexity of the situation and called it "imbalanced".

"Our franchising model already puts passengers and taxpayers first," a spokeswoman for the DfT said in an emailed statement.

Passenger and freight rail services in Britain were privatised in the 1990s, when routes were grouped into franchises and operators bid to run services for a set number of years. The network infrastructure like track is owned and managed by the government-owned Network Rail.

The Thameslink, Southern and Great Northern franchise, operated by British company Go-Ahead (L:GOG) and France's Keolis, was beset with delays, cancellations and strikes in 2016-17, prompting huge criticism from passengers and lawmakers.

On the East Coast line between London and Edinburgh, the government could end up taking over running services from Stagecoach (L:SGC) after the UK transport company got its numbers wrong, forcing it to want to pull out early.

That particular franchise has already failed twice, in 2006 and again in 2009, when the government stepped in to run the line.

In a report, the PAC report criticises the DfT for being unrealistic on several fronts, awarding contracts to bidders who had over-promised and failing to recognise the impact of complicated rail upgrade projects.

Another problem was the small number of potential bidders for contracts, it added.

The idea that the franchising model is "broken" plays into the hands of the opposition Labour party who have pledged to nationalise industries like rail and water .

"It is now clear that public ownership is the only sensible option for the future of rail," said Andy McDonald, Labour transport spokesman.

Last November, transport minister Chris Grayling proposed a shake-up of the franchise system, saying he was considering making some contracts smaller.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: On the day that rail fares increase, passengers arrive at Waterloo Station in London

The next rail contract due to be awarded is for the South Eastern franchise, expected later this year.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.