Part 1: A Realistic Framing Of The Progress In Artificial Intelligence

 | Jun 17, 2022 11:12

  • Chris Gannatti, Global Head of Research, WisdomTree
  • Let’s face it—we love exciting announcements. Why talk about the small technical improvements of a given artificial intelligence (AI) system when you can prognosticate about the coming advent of artificial general intelligence (AGI)? However, focusing too much on AGI risks missing many incremental improvements within the space along the way, very similar to how focusing solely on when cars can literally drive themselves risks missing all the incremental assisted driving features being added to cars all the time.

    DeepMind at the forefront

    The coverage of AlphaGo, DeepMind’s system that was able to best the performance of professional Go player Lee Sedol, was a game-changer. Now there is AlphaZero, AlphaFold, and more. DeepMind has made incredible progress in showing how AI can be applied to real problems. AlphaFold, for example, predicts how given proteins will fold, and, accurately knowing the shape of given proteins with accuracy unlocks enormous potential in how we think about certain medical treatments.

    The COVID-19 vaccine using mRNA was based largely on targeting the shape of the specific ‘spike-protein’. The overall protein-folding problem was something humans were focusing on for more than 50 years[1].

    However, DeepMind recently presented a new ‘generalist’ AI model called Gato. Think of it this way—AlphaGo specifically focuses on the game of Go, AlphaFold specifically focuses on protein folding—these are not generalist AI applications, as they specifically focus on a single task. Gato can[2]:

    • Play Atari video games
    • Caption images
    • Chat
    • Stack blocks with a real robot arm

    In total, Gato could do 604 tasks. This is very different than more specific AI applications that are trained on specific data to optimise only one thing.

    So, is AGI now on the Horizon?

    To be clear, full AGI is a significant jump above anything achieved to date. It’s possible that with an increase in scale, the path used by Gato could lead to something closer than anything done by AGI, it’s also possible that increasing scale goes nowhere. AGI may require breakthroughs that are as yet not determined.

    Get The App
    Join the millions of people who stay on top of global financial markets with Investing.com.
    Download Now

    People love to get ‘hyped’ on AI and its potential. In recent years, the development of GPT-3 from OpenAI was big, as was the image generator DALL-E. These were both huge achievements, but neither has led to the technology exhibiting human-level understanding, it is also unknown if the approaches used in either could lead to AGI in the future.

    If we cannot say when AGI will come, what can we say?

    While massive breakthroughs like AGI may be difficult if not impossible to predict with certainty, the focus on AI broadly has been undergoing an incredible upswing. The recently published Stanford AI Index report is extremely useful, in that one can see:

    1. The magnitude of the investment pouring into the space. Investment, in a sense, partly measures ‘confidence’, in that there has to be a reasonable belief that productive activity could result from these efforts.
    2. The breadth of AI activities and how the activities are universally showing improving metrics.

    The Growth of AI Investment

    Looking at Figure 1 below, the progression of investment growth has been staggering. We certainly recognise that this is partly driven by the excitement and potential of AI itself, it is also driven by the general environment. The fact that 2020 and 2021 showcased such large figures could be influenced by the fact that the cost of capital was minimal and money was chasing exciting stories with potential profits. Based on what we know today, it is difficult to predict if the 2022 figure will outpace 2021.

    It's also interesting to consider the evolution of the components of investment:

    • 2014 was defined by ‘public offering’, which was generally on the smaller scale of the spectrum in other years relative to the totals.
    • The primary driver of consistent growth in investment was on the private side, so it appears clear that Figure 1 depicts the cyclical upswing in private investment, which we recognise may not necessarily continue a straight-line upward trend throughout the 2020s.

    Figure 1:Global Corporate Investment in AI by INVESTMENT ACTIVITY, 2013—21