Lessons From 2017 In Using PMI Data To Map Eurozone GDP Revisions
IHS Markit | Aug 19, 2021 07:10
A marked divergence between GDP and PMI numbers in 2017 fueled speculation that the latter were sending misleading signals. The PMI numbers were climbing close to all-time highs during the year, and indicating considerably faster euro area economic growth than was being estimated by the official GDP data available at the time. However, revisions to the official data mean that we can now see that the PMI was in fact accurately prescient in predicting impressive GDP growth in 2017, repeating a pattern of the PMI tending to provide more accurate signals of actual economic conditions than the initial GDP estimates.
Forecasters that relied on the early GDP estimates consequently underestimated the strength of the eurozone economy in 2017.
To illustrate, in early 2017 the PMI was signalling a strong upturn in the Eurozone, boding well for an impressive year of economic growth.
Our PMI model - based on a simple OLS regression - pointed to a 0.64% GDP rise in the first quarter of 2017. The preliminary flash estimate from Eurostat merely showed a 0.46% gain. However, this has since been revised up to 0.65%, representing an upward revision of 0.18% and in line with the PMI signal.
Similarly in the second quarter of 2017, an initial estimate of 0.56% GDP growth has since been revised higher to 0.73% (a 0.19% revision). That compared with a PMI signal of 0.76%.
Similarly-large upward revisions were seen in the second half of the year, bringing the GDP data closer to the implied GDP expansions signalled by the survey.
Over the year, the survey data indicated an average quarterly GDP expansion in 2017 of 0.74%, which is almost exactly in line with the average of 0.76% for the revised GDP numbers (against an average initial estimate of 0.54%).
As a result, the GDP data now show the eurozone economy to have expanded by 2.8% in 2017, which was the best performance since 2007. However, such robust growth was not anticipated by many forecasters even during the second half of the year due to the disappointing early GDP estimates. The IMF, for example, was expecting full year growth of just 1.7% in its July 2017 outlook .
Get The App
While it was the divergence between the survey data and official GDP data in 2017 which caught much attention among economists, prior years had also seen many examples of the PMI providing a more reliable guide to final GDP data than the official early 'flash' GDP estimates from Eurostat (see chart 1).
These properties of the PMI were also reported in a European Central Bank staff research paper , which concluded that "these findings imply that PMI surveys are not only valuable for analysts and policymakers as a timely and reliable GDP tracker, but also for statisticians to potentially improve the accuracy of the first preliminary flash estimate of euro area real GDP."
The revisions in the GDP data depicted in chart 1 are shown by the bars in chart 2, overlaid with the advance signal from the PMI survey of the extent of the likely revisions. There is a clear relationship with the official early estimates tending to understate growth during periods of expansion and overstate during periods of decline (or when the economy is entering a period of decline).
"Disclaimer: The intellectual property rights to these data provided herein are owned by or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Any unauthorised use, including but not limited to copying, distributing, transmitting or otherwise of any data appearing is not permitted without Markit’s prior consent. Markit shall not have any liability, duty or obligation for or relating to the content or information (“data”) contained herein, any errors, inaccuracies, omissions or delays in the data, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
In no event shall Markit be liable for any special, incidental, or consequential damages, arising out of the use of the data. Purchasing Managers' Index™ and PMI™ are either registered trademarks of Markit Economics Limited or licensed to Markit Economics Limited. Markit is a registered trade mark of Markit Group Limited."
Original Post
Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.