A hastily arranged statement by the Speaker of the House of Commons has questioned the ‘legitimacy’ of government plans
Prospects of Meaningful Vote 3 going ahead were already looking shaky.
- The government had flagged that it would pull its latest attempt if chances of success were low
- William Hill and Ladbrokes (LON:LCL) had identically unfavourable odds earlier: 2/5 for 'no'; 7/4 for 'yes'
- Northern Ireland’s DUP was “100% certain” not to back the deal this week
- Other sceptics had belied indications that pro-Brexit Conservatives could soon thaw: “It is not too late to get real change to the backstop”, wrote Boris Johnson on Sunday
So the speaker’s surprise intervention got May’s deal off the hook: “government cannot legitimately resubmit…the same proposition…as that of last week”. Still, it’s obvious pressure on the government, which had yet to produce a substantive response at the time of writing, has ratchetted higher. A third vote must now be “fundamentally different”. Sterling dipped to the day’s low before reversing higher: there is as yet little new evidence of whether Brexit has been made ‘harder’ or ‘softer’, despite the drama.
- In chart terms, sterling/U.S. dollar resistance towards $1.33 remains as heavy as it has been since the end of February
- GBP/USD spiked to a $1.335 high on 27th February and then to near $1.338 last week and recoiled fast both times
- The break outside of a narrower range of the last few sessions —capped by the same levels as above with a c. $1.32 bottom—hasn’t followed through
- The overall structure looks weaker and further downward incursions aren’t ruled-out
"Disclaimer: The information and opinions in this report are for general information use only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any currency or CFD contract. All opinions and information contained in this report are subject to change without notice. This report has been prepared without regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and needs of any particular recipient.
Any references to historical price movements or levels is informational based on our analysis and we do not represent or warrant that any such movements or levels are likely to reoccur in the future. While the information contained herein was obtained from sources believed to be reliable, the author does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness, nor does the author assume any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions."